March 14, 2017

New Mold Growth Index and Safe Double-Stud Walls: WUFI Pro Shows INTELLO Plus is Key

Double-stud walls have been regarded as a simple to build, low-cost, high-performance solution since the energy crisis in the 1970’s.  (See our blog post The Double-Stud Wall Simplified: Low-Cost High Performance, and free CAD details)  Pack them right, meaning 3.8 to 4.2 lbs/cubic foot of cellulose, 2.5 lbs/cf for fiberglass or wood fiber – and as Jesse Thompson of Kaplan Thompson Architects presented at BuildingEnergy 17, as a minimum requirement, add a vented rain screen so  they have a chance to dry outward.

Since we want to build these walls as economically as possible – when does adding INTELLO Plus make sense to maintain acceptable risk?

What’s Acceptable Risk?

In Monitoring of Double-Stud Wall Moisture Conditions in the Northeast, Building Science Corporation (BSC) reported on a study of double-stud wall in Massachusetts without vapor control (ie only painted gypsum board). The study lasted for 3 years, which included 1 year when the building was unoccupied. It did show that with healthy Relative Humidity (RH) on the interior (40-50%) that the wall Moisture Content in all walls, insulated with foam and cellulose, were showing condensation. In the subsequent year, while this occupied, not-super-airtight house had a continuous exhaust fan running, and with very low interior RH as a result (20%s) – and the north-facing cellulose wall still showed MC over 20%. In the conclusion Kohta Ueno writes:

ASHRAE 160 criteria were applied to the monitored data; all walls failed (i.e., mold growth likely). However, when the walls were disassembled at the conclusion of the experiment, the sheathing and framing showed remarkably little evidence of wetting damage or mold growth. No visible mold growth was found, nor evidence of staining or water rundown. The damage was limited to some grain
raise of the interior surface of the OSB at the cellulose wall, and corrosion of fasteners.

475 has also previously discussed moisture risk per the old ASHRAE 160 standard in double-stud walls with both fiberglass and cellulose – Keeping Sheathing Dry in High-R Double-Stud Walls – a WUFI Study and Drive Safe, Build Safe.WUFI double stud wall with airbarrier Smart vapor retarder

New ASHRAE 160 and the Mold Growth Index

ASHRAE 160 has since been updated.  As stated by the USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Standard 160 has now:

…incorporated the “mold growth index,” first proposed by Viitanen and Ritschkoff (1991), which was used to quantify the amount of mold growth that occurs in laboratory tests under controlled temperature and humidity conditions. The mold growth index assigns an ordinal number between 0 (no growth) and 6 (very heavy and tight growth). The Viitanen model can calculate the mold growth index from outputs of hygrothermal simulations and incorporates time, surface temperature, surface relative humidity, and the material sensitivity class. Standard 160 now requires that the mold growth index, calculated from hygrothermal simulations, be less than 3 (the threshold for visible mold growth).

With this new and improved model, sheathing (plywood/OSB) is classified as medium sensitive to mold growth/damage and set threshold for Mold Growth Index (MGI) at 3.  475 asked Manfred Kehrer (WUFI developer /www.wufi.us) to run simulations based on this new criteria for five climates: Boston (5c), Baltimore (4c), Atlanta (3c), Miami (2c) and Seattle (4a). We used fiberglass on purpose as the lowest cost solution.

MGI ADA double stud fiberglass

The graph above shows, that for all but Miami, the walls exceed the 3 MGI threshold without INTELLO in the first winter, and the walls never recover from getting damp. You can also see this when plotting M% of the OSB/insulation interface in Baltimore, it exceeds 18% for long stretches every winter (which is higher than we recommend) and even 20% which is the level where practically all building scientists would have concern. Shown in the graph below:Double stud Moisture precentage fiberglass Baltimore

INTELLO Plus optimizes performance and insulation in double stud walls

With INTELLO Plus, these double-stud walls, with a vapor retarding exterior sheathing layer (OSB at 1-ish perms) covered with the SOLITEX MENTO actively vapor open WRB – lead to safe construction in all climate zones, and even make the Miami wall dryer (no more winter time cycling in climate zone 2).

This smart vapor retarder and airbarier also make sure that the wall performs as intended at it’s R-40+ value, as it encapsulated the fibrous insulation with airtightness on all 6 sides.MGI with INTELLO double stud fiberglass1st class event.co.uk Sweet taste of low price is soon forgettonNote that 4a climate zone (Marine) puts more stress on the assembly than even Climate zone 5 (Boston). This since the drying capability of the wall is reduces by the climate’s humidity levels. This is shown in the graph below, in which even with INTELLO Plus and some assumed construction moisture, it takes more than a year for the assembly to get below 3 and could be considered safe. As BSC pointed out in their double-stud wall research – one or two years of elevated MC is okay, and might only lead to raised grain and minor rust on screws/nails – cycling through such moisture levels every winter could cause further deterioration and thus leaving out INTELLO in such double-stud walls, would be taking a short cut that you could regret after a number of years.

, , , , , ,

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail to someone

7 Responses to New Mold Growth Index and Safe Double-Stud Walls: WUFI Pro Shows INTELLO Plus is Key

  1. Bruce March 21, 2017 at 11:53 am #

    Interesting blog. How would the simulations differ if the walls were filled with cellulose which seems to be more typical.

    Thanks -Bruce

    • John March 21, 2017 at 12:15 pm #

      Thanks for bringing that up, Bruce. We’ll address that soon in an upcoming post. Stay tuned.

  2. Jeremy Avellino March 21, 2017 at 12:34 pm #

    Great article! I would be interested as well to see the results using blown-in cellulose, blown-in wood fiber, and even mineral wool batts. Getting into the Maine coastal environment would be interesting too….Climate zone 6 with lots of humidity in the summer. Do these models assume only OSB on the exterior? If using Mento with wood strapping and a vented rainscreen does that change them significantly?

  3. Keith H April 9, 2017 at 3:23 pm #

    I’d really like to see a western climate included as well. I realize moisture management is a much smaller concern but it would be interesting to see the difference with a low RH % climate. Perhaps looking at the difference in a warm Rocky Mountain region climate (5b?) and a cold Rocky Mountain region climate (6?) would be interesting. What benefit does Intello provide, if any?

  4. Floris April 12, 2017 at 4:27 pm #

    Keith, valid question. Climate zone 5b, is not that warm, still a heating dominated climate that would benefit form INTELLO. Will check and email you.

  5. Mark May 12, 2017 at 8:25 am #

    Thank you for the article and referrals to previous articles. I would like to see Minnesota examples, climate zone 6 and 7, where we see hot and humid summers and cold and dry winters. Though recently the winters have been warmer (still colder at 25-40 degrees) and wetter, more March like for us. We recommend and many of our clients are requesting using plywood in lieu of OSB for better permeability and less down side if wetted.

Leave a Reply