INTELLO Airtight System Aces Laboratory Assembly Tests

INTELLO Airtight System Aces Laboratory Assembly Tests

First interior air barrier system to be successfully tested to ASTM E2357 and compliant with IECC, IRC 2015 and ASHRAE 90.1

Selecting appropriate materials and systems to form an inboard air barrier is a critical step in designing and building foam free, high-performance enclosure assemblies. Not only do the materials themselves need to be sufficiently airtight, but they must also perform as a complete airtightness system. With a history of proof in the field, we now provide proof in the laboratory of the airtightness of the INTELLO PLUS membrane. This membrane was tested to the highest wind/pressure load class (P3) including under extreme conditions: 1200Pa gusts. This equates to approximately 97 mph, the wind speed of a Category 2 hurricane.

We are always happy to point to successful installations of our INTELLO airtight systems as proof of the system’s ability: from hundreds of North American Passive House homes; to the 27 story Cornell Tech residential tower; the highest pre-fab PH -Schiestlhaus in Swiss alps ; to Passive House Institute Certified prefabricated enclosure systems by ECOCOR and Phoenix Haus. Every day our customers successfully utilize the Pro Clima INTELLO airtight system to support assemblies that exceed rigorous Passive House requirements.

Both ECOCOR and Phoenix Haus rely on Pro Clima air sealing to create PHI-certified opaque components
The Alpha System - a design aimed at making Passive House accessible

Real world examples are important, but sometimes third-party laboratory testing is required or specified by engineers and architects in order for projects to meet certain industry standards. For that we turn to building codes and associated testing requirements. The IECC/IRC has long referred to air barrier minimums requirements as follows:

  • Air barrier materials per ASTM E2178 ≤ 0.004CFM/SF @75Pa
  • Air barrier assemblies per ASTM E2357 ≤ 0.04CFM/SF @75Pa
  • Air barrier for whole building enclosure per ASTM E779 ≤ 0.4CFM/SF @75Pa

INTELLO had been tested previously to ASTM E2178, exceeding the testing requirements for airtight materials by a factor of 80 and by PHI as a Class A, absolute airtight system (0.00m3/m2*hr).

INTELLO has made the grade as well in code mandated blowerdoor testing to ASTM E779, ASTM E1827 (or the equivalent Passive House test EN 13829) in many buildings, for code IECC/IRC 2015 R402.4.1.2 mandated blowerdoor testing. As was shown for example in the Wood Innovation Research Laboratory (WIRL), the tightest tested building in North America.

We are happy to close the loop and report on successful ASTM E2357 testing of the INTELLO system as an assembly. As a result the INTELLO system is compliant with:

  • IECC 2015 C402.5.1.2.2
  • ABAA (Air Barrier Association of America) for airbarrier assemblies
  • ASHRAE 90.1 (commercial building energy standard, Section 5.4.3.1.3 b)

All these codes and standards define an air barrier assembly as having an average air leakage not to exceed 0.2L/s*m2 (0.04 cfm/ft2) at a pressure of 75 pa (0.3 inch of water gauge), when tested in accordance with ASTM E2357. So what’s ASTM E2357?

ASTM E2357

The whole test title is ASTM E2357 Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage of Air Barrier Assemblies. The test is performed by a third party certified testing facility, in this case by Intertek. The test is composed typically of two mockups, one with standard prescribed penetrations and one without penetrations. Each mock-up is prepared per standard procedures and placed in a test chamber. In this chamber, positive and negative pressures are applied across the assemblies in stages as the airtightness of the barrier and system components are evaluated. The diagram below shows the test mock-up with penetrations.

The system components for our INTELLO assembly test included:

  • INTELLO PLUS smart vapor retarder stapled to wood studs
  • TESCON VANA (2-3/8” / 60mm width) tape for horizontal and vertical join overlaps of membrane - including “stitch taping” at unsupported seams
  • CONTEGA SOLIDO SL (3-1/8” / 85mm) tape at window frame opening
  • ROFLEX EPDM gasket with TESCON VANA tape at pipe penetration
  • TESCON PROFIL to seal square 100mm x 100mm penetration
  • CONTEGA HF to seal outlet boxes (screws/holes) and bottom sill connection

The assembly includes horizontal battens 16” o.c. that further fix the INTELLO in place and provide a service cavity per Pro Clima’s standard installation instructions. The battens in this test, not normal service life, also supported the INTELLO Plus membrane when withstanding the high load wind cycling (positive and negative). More on that later.

Diagram of ASTM E2357 test assembly with penetrations
Here is the mock-up with penetrations under a positive test pressure
...And the mockup without penetrations, also under positive pressure

Look Mom, No Sheathing!

Typically, tested assemblies utilize rigid sheathing as part of their system, but our system does not. There is no sheathing to restrict airflow or support the membrane. This is the only successfully tested system without sheathing and the first ever tested without sheathing, period.

You Don’t Need to Tape Staples

Our installation instructions require the use of staples to mount the INTELLO PLUS membrane to the studs. For commercial, dense-pack, and wind loaded locations, we reduce the required staple spacing to 2” with 3/8”crown+leg T50 staples, such as occurs in the test.

But in the test, as on the jobsite, the staples attaching the INTELLO PLUS membrane to the framing were left untaped. Of course after such drastic wind loading with negative and positive pressures, small leakages at staples do occur. Charlotte Abele, 475’s technical and code expert witnessed these small leakages first hand, however, our air barrier system remains very airtight even after this highest class wind/pressure loading.

As we tested at such high pressures in ASTM E2357, we have now also proven in the lab that, taping of staples is not necessary to achieve excellent results. Yes, you can tape the staples, but their impact only becomes noticeable below approximately 0.25ACH50 or 0.02CFM/SF75 and is related compactness and building size. The smaller the building, the more effect taping staples will have.

Additionally, we tested INTELLO at the highest level of windloading (P3 up to 1200Pa and deflection to 1440Pa) to show its durability, even without sheathing. This assures builders they can finish an interior INTELLO air barrier before the exterior is buttoned up without worries of wind pressures negatively affecting the interior airbarrier system...

The Results

0.0097 CFM/SF 75Pa for the penetrated wall after wind loading. This is 4x tighter than the code requirement of 0.04CFM/SF75. The test has been run with the highest wind pressure and deflection loading.

Even though we won’t call the code requirement of is particularly airtight as 0.0042L/s*m2 @75Pa is a 1” (2.5mm) diameter hole in ~100Square foot (9m2) of tested airbarrier assembly, which horrifies us and most serious high performance builders and contractors.

ASTM E2357 and Blower Door Testing

475 and Pro Clima advocate for blower door testing all new construction and gut renovated projects. This quantifiable test verifies that air barriers are not only designed and detailed correctly, but also installation was properly executed in the field.

Buildings codes are moving towards compliance verification with blower door tests ASTM E779, E1827 (En 13829 or USACE blowerdoor protocol), which even at 3ACH or 0.4CFM/SF envelope leakage (like we have in NYC for commercial buildings between 25,000 and 50,000SF) are a good starting point to increase comfort, reduce damages and lower heating/cooling costs. Having 3rd party ASTM E2357 verification of our INTELLO airbarrier system certifies that our customers can use our air barrier system with confidence to comply with code and meet such “easy” targets... easily.

Continue the conversation on social media

x